A Break In the Action / What's Your Name?

All / Mom,

I've been busy with two major projects (one is for my "real" job, one is a paid "side" job), hence the lack of posting.  The blog is not finished as some of you have asked (or wished).  There will be more.  In the meantime, try visiting here:

Name of the Year (blog)

noty740.jpg

A quick glance at their logo above will demonstrate the hilarity found within its digital walls.  Hector Macho Camacho? Assumption Bulltron?  SPACEMAN AFRICA!?!?

Basically, this blog amasses HILARIOUS and REAL names from the world of sports and, March Madness bracket style, comes to a consensus winner each year.  So, to save you some trouble, here're the winners:

2009 Juvyline Cubangbang (NOTY High Committee)
2009 Barkevious Mingo (The People)
2008 Destiny Frankenstein (NOTY High Committee)
2008 Spaceman Africa (The People)
2007 Vanilla Dong
2006 Princess Nocandy
2005 Tanqueray Beavers
2004 Jerome Fruithandler
2003 Jew Don Boney Jr.
2002 Miracle Wanzo
2001 Tokyo Sexwale
2000 Nimrod Weiselfish
1999 Licentious Beastie (INVALIDATED 2006; Runner-up: Dick Surprise)
1998 L.A. St. Louis
1997 Courage Shabalala
1996 Honka Monka
1995 Ballots missing
1994 Mummenschontz Bitterbeetle (INVALIDATED 2006; Runner-up: Scientific Mapp)
1993 Crescent Dragonwagon
1992 Excellent Raymond
1992 Assumption Bulltron (Name of the Decade)
1991 Doby Chrotchtangle
1990 Otis Overcash
1989 Magnus Pelkowski
1988 No vote held
1987 No vote held
1986 No vote held
1985 Godfrey Sithole
1984 No vote held
1983 Hector Camacho

The whole blog is worth reading, but here's another quicky if you don't have time for the whole thing.  My guess is that if you're reading my blog, you have the time: NOTY Hall of Name

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

ET's Out of This World Picks (Dan Jente Edition)

By Daniel Jente, Horse Handicapper Extraordinaire


(UPDATE 5/2/09: WATCH YOUTUBE VIDEO AT THE END OF THIS POST)

kentucky-derby-135-logo.jpg


How Bet the 135th Kentucky Derby:  The right bet with the right horses


There are several different type of bets offered in the Kentucky Derby other than the normal Win, Place and Show wagers. There are exacta, trifecta’s, superfecta’s, daily doubles, daily triples, pick 3’s, 4’s, 5’s and 6’s etc. This year, there is an amazing horse in the Kentucky Oaks, the female version of the Kentucky Derby. The Oaks is run on Friday, the day before the Kentucky Derby. I will take advantage of this horse’s dominance to make some money in the “Derby / Oaks Double”.


What is the Derby Oaks double you may ask? Well to successfully win at this bet, you must pick the winner of the Kentucky Oaks and the Kentucky Derby. Also, this wager MUST be entered in at the betting facility before the 11th Race at Churchill downs on FRIDAY, the day before the Kentucky Derby. Now this sounds complicated, but let me explain.


This year the Kentucky Oaks has a field of 8 females. The Kentucky Derby has a full field of 20 males. So, simple math tells you that there are 160 possible winning combinations (8 * 20 = 160). Most of these combinations have an extremely low chance of winning.


To make this bet playable, you must have an angle or a horse that you really like to keep the cost of the tickets low. Well, as I mentioned, I have an angle. In the Kentucky Oaks, I LOVE the #6 horse, Rachel Alexandra (UPDATE: SEE YOUTUBE VIDEO AT THE END OF THIS POST...). Rachel Alexandra is an EXTREMELY talented female horse. She has won her previous four races by a combined margin of 23 lengths. She has raced over the surface at Churchill Downs before and romped in that race. She has raced in wet weather as well as races of the same distance as the Kentucky Oaks. She had the most impressive workout of all horses leading up to the Derby, including all the males in the Derby. I think she is talented enough that she could have even be a legitimate contender in the Kentucky Derby. In any other situation I would just flat out bet Rachel Alexandra to win, but because of her dominance in this race, she will have extremely short odds. Most likely 1-10 or for every $2 wagered you would make 10 cents. The risk reward doesn’t make sense. The derby / oaks double lets you extract some value out of her and increase her odds.


So, of the 8 horses in the Oaks, I am using 1 in the double. By singling Rachel Alexandra in the Oaks Derby Double, it cuts out 140 possible winning combinations, leaving only 20 possible combinations.


Now, the Kentucky Derby: In the weeks leading up to the derby, there have been several horses that have decided not to race because of either an injury or lack of preparation. These scratches have whittled down the possible legitimate threats to win the derby.


This year like most, I narrow down the field to the contenders I like, then assign them a rating of A, B, or C based on how well I like them, how I think the race will set up, how there post position effects their chance of winning, etc. An “A” horse has the best chance of winning down to a “C” being a long shot but a contender. Here are my contenders after they have been rated:


A

# 6 Fresian Fire

# 13 I Want Revenge

# 15 Pioneer of the Nile

# 16 Dunkirk


B

# 10 Regal Ransom

# 19 Desert Party


C

# 7 Papa Clem

# 11 Chocolate Candy


My Tickets:


Ticket #1: $20 Oaks Derby Double --- 6 with the 6, 13, 15, 16 = Total Cost $80


This is my main ticket. Each ticket costs $8. I am going to play this bet for the $20 or 10 tickets. For a total of $80 wagered. Possible payout in my estimation would be approximately $30 - $75 for each winning ticket depending on which horse won the race. That would give a total possible return of $300 - $750.


Ticket #2: $20 Oak Derby Double --- 6 with the 10, 19 = Total Cost $40


Each ticket would cost $4. I am going to play this bet for the $20 or 10 tickets. Total cost of all tickets $40. This ticket could in my estimation pay out between $80 and $150 for each winning ticket. That would give a total possible return of $720 to $1350 for all winning tickets.


My final ticket is: $10 Oaks Derby Double --- 6 with the 7, 11 = Total Cost $20


Each ticket would cost $2. I am going to do this bet for the $10 or 5 tickets. Total cost of all tickets $20. An individual winning ticket could pay about $125. That would give a total possible return on investment of $625.


In summary, the tickets in total will cost you $140 for a possible return on investment of at least $300 to $1350. Playing a bet like the Derby Oaks Double takes a dominate horse like Rachel Alexandra who will most have extremely short odds and increase them by taking a little risk. Good luck!




NOTE: I am wagering, uh... some money on this race.  Dan is wagering some more on this race... we're gonna be rich!!!




Filed under  //

Comments [0]

@Twitter: Twitter = Apocalypse: Reduxe & Reloaded - Special Limited Edition

My Cousin Jay's Wife Christine sent me this HILARIOUS cartoon; it is a great companion piece to this post I made last week about my doubts in the worthwhileness (word?) of Twittering / Twatting / Twotes / Twats / Tweets / Twonts / Twhatevers... expressed via the eloquence of William Bowers of Pitchfork.com.  I think it is safe to say I "Twon't" be Twittering any time soon (I am ashamed to have written that.  Please forgive me.).

Also, I'd like to use this word: "harbinger".  So, I will:  "Twitter is a harbinger of the Humility Apocalypse; it is a flag on the summit of Mount Narcissism, the Height of Hubris.  We have arrived, and now begins our descent..."

The original link is in the comments of the aforelinked post on WRS.  Here's the hilarity:


Filed under  //

Comments [1]

Criminal of the Week: Docket #1-8

By Tom "Manowar" Busler, WRS Crimonologist Emeritus - Honorary Designate

A few weeks ago, the city of Creve Coeur, MO was rocked by one of the most shocking crimes of the century.  Even as police were dispatched to the scene, the criminal lowlife was still at his sickening deeds.  Yes, still pounding away, was he, even as they knocked on the door of this depraved lunatic's hellish lair... then it stopped.

The authorities subdued the fiend and the townspeople of Creve Coeur were once again able to go back to their TV dinners, their Sunday comics, their gardening, soccer practices, and church groups... the reviled reprobate was put to bay, his nefarious plots relegated to the past.  But the ringing in their ears would serve as a reminder to the citizens of Creve Coeur that, although he had been silenced momentarily, the axe weilding maniac of Camden Cove would certainly be back.

Who was this cacophonous creature and what were his crimes, you ask?  The ne'er-do-well was none other than your heinous host, Tom Busler, and the charges against me?  Playing Guitar Hero: Metallica at [GASP! HORRORS!] 6:45 on a Friday night.  At volume 23 (of 60).  I normally watch TV at between settings 20-25  (late at night on a Tuesday).

n33310604_32864958_6448.jpg
The axe-weilding maniac, here seen disturbing the peace at his
84-year-old grandmother's house.  She was cool with it.

Seriously.  My "neighbors" called the cops on me at 6:-friggin'-45 in the PM on a Friday for playing Guitar Hero.  I COULD STILL HEAR THE CLICKING OF THE STRUM BAR ON THE PLASTIC GUITAR!  That is how not loud I was playing.  You would have thought a SWAT team was coming through my door with a battering ram the way the pig cop pounded.  The "Waco Massacre" raid on the Branch Davidians?  Yeah... slightly less forceful.

I was "warned" for 'Disturbing the Peace,' and informed that if it happened again, I would be charged and forced to appear in court.  I asked the cop if it was cool working in a town where the worst-of-the-worst were plastic-toy toting video gamers and he wasn't amused.  I also told him that I would like to lodge a harrassment chage against my neighbors for summoning excessive force against me while I was acting within the terms of my leasing agreement ("quite" hours are between 10:00 PM and 10:00 AM).  He said, and I quote, "No.  Have a nice evening and keep it down."

I did keep it down, sitting at my computer for 2+ hours drafting a formal complaint to my leasing office, who sided with me.

I still play GH: Metallica (on volume '24'... "one louder"), but it is actually a little bit more fun now knowing how much it bothers other people.  Isn't that what metal is all about?  Ticking someone off?

I also slam my cabinets with an uncommon zest and wait about 5 minutes before I shut off my strategically positioned alarm clock every morning at 5:15 (it is near our shared wall).  Coincidentally, my actual guitar playing has also improved.  I have had a resurgance in my desire to learn, hammering away on all my favorite garage-rock anthems until about 9:59 every night.  I plan on hosting a "My Bloody Valentine"-esque concert on the day I move out if anyone wants to come by.

As they say: "Good earplugs make good neighbors."


Finally, Someone Pegged It: Why Twitter = Apocalypse

"The 'status' update that was the lamest and most indulgent element of MySpace is the most abused feature of Facebook, and such mundane-to-desperate broadcasts are almost Twitter's entire raison d'etre. I mean, what would be the analog equivalent: if I went around just yelling about what I was in the middle of doing, or anticipating doing, or just did? Oh, for the ability to telepathically inform all of my 'friends'-- and creepy-sheepier 'followers'-- that I was 'considering chili this afternoon,' or that 'my pajamas itch,' or that 'laundromat=out of quarters'.... I mean, this medium limits folks to 140 characters and they love it? The people have spoken, and they want to be told to shut up.... Plus, 'twit' is synonymous with 'fool'! 'Twittering' is admitting that you're dithering, right?"

-William Bowers, via Pitchfork.com's excellent column Puritan Blister

Read the whole thing.  It is both hilarious and insightful.  But it is more than 140 words.  You can do it, I promise.  Just pop an Adderall and you'll be fine.

puritan425.jpg
twitter.jpg

Filed under  //

Comments [2]

Area Man Thanks Jesus for Half-Day at Work, Eternal Salvation

The Weekly FunByte - Religion

TACOMA, WA - As millions of the nation's devout took time on Friday to solemnly remember the sacrifice that the Son of God, Jesus Christ of Nazareth, made with his crucifixion, Jim Haggerdy had extra reason to be thankful.  "Good Friday?  More like GREAT Friday, if you ask me," Haggerdy said after downing his third pint of Harp Lager at Malarkey's Pool & Brew on Friday afternoon.


Jim Haggerdy seen here piously remembering Christ's death

Haggerdy, an accounts receivable manager at Boeing, was notified earlier in the week by his supervisor and devout Christian, Mark Greenwell, that their team could take a half-day on Friday in honor of the religious holiday.  "Normally, I'd still be droning away on some pointless spreadsheet right now," Haggerdy slurred, "but Mark came through big time with that email.  I was all like, 'Thank God for Mark!,' ya know?"  Halfway through a mozzarella stick, he added, "Oh, and for Jesus, too."

Good Friday is not an official holiday at Boeing, but Greenwell assured his staffers that they should not have to take any vacation to spend time meditating on Christ's gift to humanity, an opportunity Haggerdy "wasn't about to pass up."  It was only seconds after receiving the email that several members of AR-Div 16, Haggerdy's accounting division, decided on spending their religious holiday at Malarkey's.  "Saul Goldstein and Ari Blumenfeld immediately emailed me with the idea to go [to Malarkey's]," Haggerdy explained.  "I guess they were eager to reflect on the significance of JC's death, too."

It was the second time in under a week that Haggerdy had found himself celebrating his "heartfelt" religious views after he was given the chance to leave early on Thursday to prepare for Passover Seder activities.

Filed under  //

Comments [0]

Trivia Battle Continues; Tom Is Swindled Yet Again

In the ongoing trivia war of Tom vs Connor (aka "Good vs Evil," Light vs Darkness," "Human vs Werewolf / Lagoon Banshee-Hybrid Super-Villian," or what-have-you), we have had a new battle.  I have learned that many previously-thought "neutral" participants, the perceived Swiss of this epic showdown, are actually turncoat traitors... in bed with the enemy.  Well, at the very least they're simpatico with one another.  It seems that Megan, the TriviaMaster, has made a habit of siding with my nemesis, Count Conniving (aka Graf Carnivorous the Terrible; aka Gozer the Gozerian; aka Connor Clune).


Here we see a picture of Connor Clune in his "Graf Carnivorous the Terrible" guise; he is a shape-shifting minon of Hades.  He holds in his decrepit, child-snatching hands a crib sheet of trivia answers

In the latest transgression, Judas Megan awarded Gozer a point for his "shot-in-the-dark" prayer of a guess that came almost 72 hours after the original question was issued.  Any amount of illegal research could have been conducted in the Infernal Serpent's time away from work, yet she allowed his almost certainly compromised reply to count.  I, after recovering from a stupor of incredulity, insisted that a new "midnight" rule be put into place to prevent future cheatfests from occurring.  Here was my message to the complicit conspirators:

I don’t think he [Count Conniving] should get credit for (his answer) due to its being SEVERAL days late.  NO LONGER WILL THIS INJUSTICE STAND.  Henceforth, credit shall ONLY be given for questions answered in the day they were asked, unless in such instance where either participant is out-of-the-office FOR PERSONAL REASONS OR VACATION, in which they must answer the day of return, and not a single day later.  If a participant is out-of-the-office for business reasons, they should be on their email anyway and can answer remotely.  The midnight deadline applies.

 

Let the record show, I now believe you, Connor, to be of dubious integrity.  Upon hearing of your insistence that this blatantly tardy point be scored, I knew I was no longer in a childish game of fun and frivolity, but rather a cutthroat bloodsport of ruthless tactics and rampant immorality.  Just know, should you ultimately prevail at year’s end, Connor, (if that is, indeed, your name) it will be with an asterisk and totally devoid of any shard of honor.  Your victory will forever be tarnished by the blemish of your pathetic “scrapping for points.”  It is largely due to my goodwill in conceding this in-fact trivial point that you advance in our struggle; as such, you can take my charity all day, so long as you do so with full realization of the humiliating shame and overwhelming impotence that, by natural law, correspondingly follow.  Connor, I hope you are cognate of your status as a pariah in the minds of all noble trivia players the world over; nay, at this point, it stops NOT at trivia - you are an object of outright scorn among anyone who conducts him or herself with honesty and purity of heart, trivia or otherwise.  Your grandchildren will rue your very existence and salacious stories of your dastardly deeds will flit off the tongues of school children for eons.  Yes, today is a grave and ashen black mark on the face Lady Liberty, governess of all that is fair and right with this world.  Our nation is irrevocably marred, our innocence forever lost.  And for what?  The slaking of the greed and the indulgence of the hubris of one, lowly rapscallion; that monstrous night marauder who broke down our door of fidelity and absconded forthwith with righteousness squirming in his crooked grasp into his hideous lair of debauchery and infernal intent.  Sleep well, Connor.  Sleep well with your conscience, you unscrupulous rogue.  I hope the trivia point is worth the despise of millions.  You’ve earned it.  I pray that your victimization of the good and kind people of this great nation ends with me, so that others might be spared from your maniacal quest to rape the modest of their virtuousness.

[Spit] -Tom (The Valiant-Hearted)

Shortly thereafter, the Legion of Loathe (Megan & Connor) confirmed that they would nevertheless count his point despite my protest to the contrary and that they were amused with my message.  They also informed me that they had cast a spell on your humble protagonist using a chicken gizzard, some mystic herbs, and the skull of a Carpathian virgin.  I thought that was a bit over the top for a lighthearted office trivia contest.  Thus, my final riposte:

This is a vile den of iniquity.  I simply cannot believe I am surrounded by such criminal miscreants, such scheming scamps.  A pox on you all; I despise your existence.  I used to believe in justice… in the fraternal bonds of our [team's] sacred alliance.  I cherished the camaraderie we once shared.  Now, I am certain that you are all acting in concert against me.  I am crestfallen at your treacherous disloyalty, you pack of conniving reprobates.

 

Your faithful and upstanding whipping-boy, unfazed by the dagger of your common hatred plunged deeply into my back,

 

-Tom


Artist's rendering of Graf Carnivorous the Terrible versus Tom the Valiant-Hearted

Filed under  //

Comments [2]

ET's Out of This World Picks: $10,700 (Week 3)

By Eric “Shoeless Joe Jackson” Timmons

 

 

I love betting on America’s Pastime.  So much fun and excitement.  It is a peerless game full of history and heroes.  There is nothing quite like watching it on TV for hours on end; I genuinely savor the months and months I get to spend consuming ceaseless highlights, analysis, and prognostications on ESPN.  Unfortunately, the sport I am speaking of (football) doesn’t start for over five months.  I guess we will have to settle for the “sport” that has become a microcosm of what is wrong with our country.  Again, I've probably got you fooled... I’m not talking about pro wrestling, either.  The staged spectacle I'm referring to is, of course, Major League Baseball.

 

So let’s get excited about watching a bunch of cheating, overpaid, and soft athletes occasionally have to run 90 feet.  I figure if they profit off of us ($6 hotdogs!?!  $10 beers?!?!), we should profit off of them, and what better team to start with than the New York Yankees.  One Yankee player, cheater A-Roid, makes more than the combined payrolls of five other teams.  He must be pretty good, right?  Well, as soon as he returns from his completely natural injury, I guess we’ll find out.

 

THE BET

 

We will take the New York Yankees on 4/6/2009 for $370.  The line is the Yankees -$185 on 5Dimes.  We will bet $370 to net a profit of $200.  We are already up $700 on the year.  A loss will not hurt us, but how could the greatest sports franchise in the history of the world lose?

 

CURRENT BANKROLL

Last Week Starting Amount:

$10,200

Result:

$500

This Week Starting Amount:

$10,700

Wager:

$370

Upside:

$200

MJ = HOF? You've got to be KIDDING!!!

It’s official: Michael Jordan is a Hall-of-Famer.  Also, today is Monday.  Both of the previous statements are about equally as revelatory. 

In other news, David Robinson, John Stockton, Jerry Sloan, and some other people are, too.

I thought this was an interesting take by Scoop Jackson of ESPN’s Page 2.

I know we’ve all marveled at the Man, the Majesty that WAS, His Royal Airness, Michael Jordan.  More than anyone else in any sport, there are plays he made that will NEVER fade from my memory.  I can practically watch a high-def quality highlight reel of his greatest moments in my head anytime I want… that’s how much of an impact they made on me.  Here are a few that are particularly vivid:

·         “The ‘I don’t even know how I do this’ shoulder shrug

·         “The hand-switch lay-up versus the Lakers”

·         “The free-thrown-line dunk”

·         “The crazy fake-out baseline spin move on basically the whole Knicks team w/ Patrick Ewing finishing move”

·         “The perfect court-level shot of him rolling right, switching back to his left, popping up and hitting the Championship-winning jumper over a stumbling Byron Russell

·         The jumping fist-pumpthe shot.”

·         Crying with trophy

Bottom line: Greatest athlete, sportsman, and competitor of all-time.  Gatorade hit the nail on the head and made the perfect commercial, capturing the longings and dreams of millions around the world who, if even once, wanted to occupy the same rarefied air as the GOAT: “Oh, if I could be like Mike.”

The fact that I could have written this about 20 years ago is a testament to how good MJ really was.  The words "foregone conclusion" were invented for just these very circumstances as his being tapped for this honor was as inevitable as, well, Michael Jordan going into the Hall of Fame.  In fact, it almost seems like a mere-HOF induction is a bit of a slight.  If anyone deserves an entirely different shrine, apart from all the others, he does.  For the man that seemed like he had two of them, at least give him his own wing.

Thanks, Mike.


Filed under  //

Comments [1]

Formal Complaint Lodged Against Calendar Company: "It's anything but trivial!"

Below is the text of a letter I wrote to "Page-A-Day" in regard to yesterday's trivia question.  I'm in a "trivia duel" at work with a coworker and, while I have a narrow lead, I don't want him to get a point for something I feel was a poorly designed question / answer.  What do YOU, WRS Readers Collective, think?  Am I right?  Chime in in the "Comments" section below.  As of this morning, I have received notification from the "technical staff" of the calendar company that this has been submitted to their editor for review.  In any event, here's the "formal grievance":

Dear Page-A-Day Staff,

On your “365 Amazing Trivia Facts” calendar, the question for 26 March 2009 was “How many calories will the average slice of bread lose after toasting?”  The stated answer on the back of the page was “None.  Toasting removes moisture, not calories.

I am in a heated and running contest with a coworker using your calendar.  We are asked all of the questions by a different coworker (the calendar owner) and today’s question has sparked a debate between me and my opponent.  I am positing that his answer, which matches yours, is wrong.

I agree that with a perfect “toasting,” (almost like a physics question that asks you to suspend reality and assume “no friction” for a spring problem) all that would be lost is moisture and that the mass lost would be of zero caloric content, leaving the remaining toasted bread with all of its original calories.  The way the question was asked, however, suggest that it would be under average circumstances using average bread, and I can tell you that if you look in the bottom of the average toaster, you’ll see a TON of crumbs.  Those crumbs obviously have calories and they represent the total aggregate number of calories lost by the bread toasted therein since such time when, A) it was new, or B) it was last cleaned.  Therefore, each slice of bread would lose on average:

(total caloric content of the collected crumbs) / (total # of slices of bread put through that toaster since the crumb tray was last emptied)


If you find my argument to have merit, my opponent's point will be expunged and our competition will go on.  Thank you for your consideration.  For fairness, he and the calendar owner are cc'd on this email.

-Tom

Filed under  //

Comments [3]